Northern Provident Investments Limited

  • No Win, No Fee
  • No hidden charges
  • Over 13 years experience
  • Specialist solicitors
  • Professional friendly service

Northern Provident Investments Limited enters into liquidation

Investors face prospect of significant losses caused by unsuitable and high-risk “mini-bonds”

Many people are facing the prospect of losing significant amounts of money having invested into financial products which were endorsed by a Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) authorised and regulated company named Northern Provident Investments Limited (NPI).

NPI previously operated an online crowdfunding platform where investors could purchase a variety of investments; including debentures and shares in unrelated third party companies; many of which were held in “mini-bonds”.

A mini-bond is an unlisted debt security, normally issued by a small business in order to raise funds. Mini-bonds can be appealing to investors because of the interest rates on offer, but they are usually illiquid and are not transferable. The return on an investors’ money entirely depends on the success and proper running of the issuer’s business.

NPI also acted as an Innovative Finance ISA (IFISA) manager for the investments on offer. An IFISA allows an investor to make peer-to-peer lending investments within a tax-free wrapper. Such a wrapper may seem appealing, but the underlying investments held in an IFISA are typically much riskier than a mainstream ISA.

NPI facilitated investments into mini-bonds by accepting funds and transferring these funds to a bond issuer. It is understood that the NPI website frequently suggested that the investments it approved were low-risk, however, the reality is that they were, in fact, often unsuitable and high-risk.

For example, NPI approved several financial promotions relating to the, “Blackmore Bond”. Between 2016 and 2018, Blackmore Bond plc (Blackmore) raised millions of pounds, almost all of it from small-scale individual investors, in order to fund property developments. It is understood that approximately 2,800 individuals invested funds with Blackmore. These victims were repeatedly told that their investment was guaranteed to be paid back on time with regular interest payments, however, Blackmore fell into administration on 22 April 2020 and then collapsed into liquidation, whilst still owing £46m to investors.

NPI itself entered into creditors’ voluntary liquidation on 20 August 2021. Following the liquidation announcement, it has been confirmed by the FCA that it had imposed confidential requirements on NPI in February 2020 and compelled it to cease approving any further financial promotions.

A FCA publication first issued on 26 November 2019 called, “Approving financial promotions” contains useful guidance as to what is expected of a regulated firm when it approves a financial promotion:

“You should therefore analyse, and carry out due diligence regarding, the substance of a promotion before approving its content for communication by an unauthorised person…When assessing whether a promotion is fair, clear and not misleading, a firm may need to consider (among other things):

  • The authenticity of the proposition described in the relevant promotion. This may mean undertaking background checks on directors, controllers or other key individuals associated with the product provider.
  • The commercial viability of the proposition described in the promotion. Has the promotion adequately disclosed any significant factors that could threaten the product’s viability?
  • Could potential investors make an informed decision about investment?
  • Whether advertised or headline rates of return are reasonably capable of being achieved. This may mean reviewing materials such as the product provider’s financial statements and/or management accounts, business plan, financial projections and capital position.
  • Whether there are any fees, commissions or other charges within the investment’s structure or elsewhere that could materially affect the ability of the product provider to deliver advertised or headline rates of return.
  • If the product is advertised as being eligible for a particular tax treatment (e.g. for inclusion within an Innovative Finance ISA), does the product actually meet the requirements for this treatment?”

Financial promotions approved by NPI were often shown to investors and used as a tool to persuade them to invest.

NPI was regulated by the FCA from July 2015. If you invested into an IFISA or other investment promoted by NPI from July 2015 onwards then you could have grounds for a claim against NPI.

An announcement on the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) website dated 6 August 2021 stated that it was not currently accepting claims against NPI:

We need to establish whether there are valid claims against the firm. For this to happen we need to know that NPI carried out a regulated activity in relation to customers’ investments that would lead to claims that FSCS may be able to protect.”

Nevertheless, if you are affected, then we would like to hear from you. As experts in claims that involve a regulated firm approving financial promotions, we are currently acting for several individuals who are pursuing civil claims in the courts and at the FSCS, as a result of failed investments made into IFISA’s and mini-bonds. We may also be able to assist you in bringing a no win, no fee claim to recover your losses.

Please call us on 0800 152 2620 for further advice, or fill in the form and one of our solicitors will call you back at a convenient time.

NO WIN, NO FEE

Take our 15sec test to see if you could be entitled to compensation

We're committed to ethical marketing and we'll NEVER cold-call or send spam emails or text messages to you
More info on hoax calls

Mis-selling or mis-management by a SIPP Operator?

Have you suffered financial losses on a SIPP operated by a SIPP operator? If so, then you may have grounds for bringing a No Win No Fee claim.

Some SIPP operators have entered into dealings with third party advisers who are not authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority to give pension or investment advice. This is despite their regulatory body publishing alerts and giving warnings against such actions.

View More

Mis-sold or mis-managed investment or pension?

  • You were sold an investment without having been properly advised of the risks
  • Your personal circumstances or attitude to risk wasn’t properly considered
  • You were sold a SIPP or poor returning annuity
  • You were advised to invest all or most of your savings into a single investment
View More

We've got your questions covered

One of the UK’s leading specialists in financial mis-selling... The Times
finance-monthly trustpilot

Make a no obligation enquiry

We're committed to ethical marketing and we'll NEVER cold-call or send spam emails or text messages to you
More info on hoax calls